Looking for a scapegoat, world again turns to Jews
Article Last Updated: 09/12/2007 11:46:04 PM MDT
Who recently said: "These Jews started 19 Crusades. The 19th was World War 1. Why? Only to build Israel."
Some holdover Nazi?
Hardly. It was former Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan of Turkey, a NATO ally. He went on to claim
that the Jews - whom he refers to as "bacteria" - controlled China, India and Japan, and ran the United States.
Who alleged: "The Arabs who were involved in 9/11 cooperated with the Zionists, actually.
It was a cooperation. They gave them the perfect excuse to denounce all Arabs." A conspiracy nut?
Actually, it was former Democratic U.S. Sen. James Abourezk of South Dakota. He denounced Israel on
a Hezbollah-owned television station, adding: "I marveled at the Hezbollah resistance to Israel . . . It was a marvel of organization,
of courage and bravery."
And finally, who claimed at a United Nations-sponsored conference that democratic Israel was "much
worse" than the former apartheid South Africa, and that it "undermines the international community's reaction to global warming"?
A radical environmentalist wacko?
Again, no. It was Clare Short, a member of the British parliament. She was a secretary for international
development under Prime Minister Tony Blair.
A new virulent strain of the old anti-Semitism is spreading worldwide. This hate - of a magnitude
not seen in over 70 years - is not just espoused by Iran's loony president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or radical jihadists.
The latest anti-Semitism is also now mouthed by world leaders and sophisticated politicians and
academics. Their loathing often masquerades as "anti-Zionism" or "legitimate" criticism of Israel. But the venom exclusively
reserved for the Jewish state betrays their existential hatred.
Israel is always lambasted for entering homes in the West Bank to look for Hamas terrorists and
using too much force. But last week the world snoozed when the Lebanese army bombarded and then crushed the Nahr al-Bared
refugee camp, which harbored Islamic terrorists.
The world has long objected to Jewish settlers buying up land in the West Bank. Yet Hezbollah,
flush with Iranian money, is now purchasing large tracts in southern Lebanon for military purposes and purging them of non-Shiites.
Here at home, "neoconservative" has become synonymous with a supposed Jewish cabal of Washington
insiders who hijacked U.S. policy to take us to war for Israel's interest. That our state department is at the mercy of a
Jewish lobby is the theme of a recent high-profile book by professors at Harvard University and the University of Chicago.
Yet when the United States bombed European and Christian Serbia to help Balkan Muslims, few critics
alleged that American Muslims had unduly swayed President Clinton. And such charges of improper ethnic influence are rarely
leveled to explain the billions in American aid given to non-democratic Egypt, Jordan or the Palestinians - or the Saudi oil
money that pours into American universities.
The world likewise displays such a double standard. It seems to care little about the principle
of so-called occupied land - whether in Cyprus or Tibet - unless Israel is the accused. Mass murdering in Cambodia, the Congo,
Rwanda and Darfur has earned far fewer United Nations' resolutions of condemnation than supposed atrocities committed by Israel.
A number of British academics are sponsoring a boycott of Israeli scholars but leave alone those from autocratic Iran, China
There are various explanations for the new anti-Semitism. For many abroad, attacking Jews and Israel
is an indirect way of damning its main ally, the United States - by implying that Americans are not entirely evil, just hoodwinked
by those sneaky and far more evil Jews.
At home, there are obvious pragmatic considerations. Some Americans may find it makes more sense
to damn a few million Israelis without oil than it does to offend Israel's adversaries in the Middle East, who number in the
hundreds of millions and control nearly half the world's petroleum reserves.
Cowardice explains a lot. Libeling Israel won't earn someone a fatwa or a death sentence in the
manner comparable criticism of Islam might. There are no Jewish suicide bombers in London, Madrid or Bali.
This new face of anti-Semitism is so insidious because it is so well disguised, advanced by self-proclaimed
diplomats and academics - and now embraced by the supposedly sophisticated left on university campuses.
When national, collective or personal aspirations are not met, it is far easier to blame someone
or something rather than to look within for the source of the failure and frustration. More recently, someone must be blamed
for getting terrorists (with oil and its profits behind them) mad at us.
That someone is - no surprise - once again Jews.
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University,
and author, most recently, of A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War. You can reach
him by e-mailing firstname.lastname@example.org