Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Countering Bias and Misinformation mainly about the Arab-Israel conflict

Canadian university president slammed for accepting JNF award

HOME
MISCELLANEOUS ARTICLES
INTERNATIONAL LAW
THE SAN REMO CONFEERENCE IN CONTEXT
THE GOLDSTONE MISSION TO GAZA 2009
THE OCCUPATION
GAZA and HAMAS
1948 ARAB-ISRAEL WAR
THE SIX-DAY WAR & RESOLUTION 242
BEHAVIOR OF ISRAELI SOLDIERS
DEIR YASSIN - startling evidence
1967 & ITS CONSEQUENCES
PALESTINIAN REFUGEES
WHAT SOME ARAB COMMENTATORS SAY
APARTHEID,ISRAEL & SOUTH AFRICA
LEBANON & HEZBOLLAH
HUMAN RIGHTS
ISLAMIC EXTREMISM
MEDIA DISTORTIONS
BOYCOTTS & DIVESTMENT
INCITEMENT
MEMORANDA TO UK PARLIAMENT
DOCUMENTS & ARTICLES
RECOMMENDED LINKS
THE ICJ & THE WALL
ACADEMIC FREEDOM
About Maurice Ostroff
 
 
Faculty members at University of Western Ontario,  attack the university president  for accepting an award from the JNF. They claim that his "Speech obscures Palestinian suffering"
 
 
For more info click on the relevant link
Speech obscures Palestinian suffering
Article in Western News

By Faculty Members
Thursday, June 19, 2008
With utter dismay we read Paul Davenport's speech at the Jewish National Fund (JNF) dinner held at the Best Western Lamplighter Inn on June 1.

Earlier, faculty, students and community members, including Muslims, Jews and Christians had presented Davenport with very strong evidence on the role of the JNF in the expulsion of Palestinians and the usurpation of their land. His claims to diversity, equality and justice are undermined by accepting an award for tolerance from an organization that allocates confiscated land to Jews only, described even by prominent Israeli scholars and human rights organizations as a racist policy.

Davenport's blindness to Palestinian suffering is disgraceful: in Jerusalem, he visits Yad Vashem, but says nothing of the ongoing ethnic cleansing of the city's Palestinian inhabitants. He attends a Negev dinner but says nothing about the Negev's (al-Naqab) Palestinian Bedouin and the JNF's role in past and ongoing displacement of the indigenous nomadic population and the seizure of their lands.

In the Galilee, Davenport celebrated Israel's rehabilitation of the En Ro'im Spring, an area haunted by the destruction of Palestinian villages and the gruesome massacres of Palestinian villagers in Safsaf, Jish, Sa'sa', Saliha, Eilabun, Majd al-Kurum, Deir al-Asad, Nasr al-Din, 'Ayn Zaytun, Khisas, Kabri, al-Bi'na, Nahf and Hula.

In Hula alone, a village to which Davenport refers, on Oct. 31, 1948, Jewish forces killed more than 80 Palestinian villagers. Such massacres are thoroughly documented. Here is just one quote from the diary of Yosef Nahmani, director of the JNF office in Eastern Galilee between 1935 and 1965:

In Safsas, after the inhabitants had raised a white flag, the [soldiers] collected and separated the men and women, tied the hands of 50-60 fellahin [peasants] and shot and killed them and buried them in a pit. Also, they raped several women; At Eilabun and Farradiya the soldiers had been greeted with white flags, and rich food, and afterwards had ordered the villagers to leave, with their women and children. When the [villagers] had begun to argue [the soldiers] had opened fire and after some 30 people were killed, had begun to lead the rest [towards Lebanon]; In Saliha, where a white flag had been raised they had killed about 60-70 men and women. Is there no more humane way of expelling the inhabitants than such methods?

Davenport said: "We toured the Birya Forest outside of Tsfat. With a JNF guide, we also toured the Hula Valley nature reserve and admired the dazzling variety ... of birds and other wildlife. We left ... with a profound admiration for what the people of Israel have achieved under extraordinarily difficult conditions.

Biriyya, the original Arabic name for Birya, was occupied by the Zionist elite unit, the Palmach, which expelled the population and ordered the burning of the village houses. Concealed under Birya Forest, marketed by the JNF as one of its most successful green projects, lie the ruins of homes and lands of six Palestinian villages: Alma, Amqa, Ayn al-Zaytun, Dishon, Biriyya (Birya) and Qaddita. Davenport was dazzled by Hula's wildlife, but said nothing of the suffocation of Palestinian life, especially in the West Bank and Gaza.

In these illegally occupied territories, Israel warped Palestinian life into a daily nightmare, and there also the JNF stamped its signature in the form of the infamous Canada Park, burying the traces of three demolished villages. These JNF green zones entwine with Israeli security zonesand expanding Jewish settlements rendering any reference to an independent Palestinian state a hollow slogan for Western consumption.

Although the Palestinian anti-colonial struggle has straddled two centuries, and Palestinian voices emerge from Palestine, squalid refugee camps and places of exile, Davenport's speech echoes Israel's attempts to erase from Western consciousness the presence, dispossession and suffering of Palestinians.

As members of the Western community, we feel ashamed of our president and more determined than ever to continue to speak out for justice for Palestine.

The diary portion above is cited in: Nahmani diary, Nov. 6, 1948 in Benny Morris, "Falsifying the Record: A Fresh Look at Zionist Documentation of 1948, Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Spring, 1995), p. 55.

The writers
This article was signed by faculty members Randa Farah, David Heap, Rebecca Coulter, Chet Creider, Sasha Torres, Wael Haddara, Paul Handford, Douglass St. Christian, Peter Chidiac, Marjorie Ratcliffe, Matthew Rowlinson, Sahza Hatibovic Kofman, Roger Khayat, Abhijit Gopal, Tozun Bahcheli, Mireya Folch-Serra, Bernie Hammond, Lesley Short, Muhammad N. Saad and Mahmoud El-Sakka,


An open letter from Maurice Ostroff
To Faculty Members at the University of Western Ontario, who subscribed to the June 19, 2008 article in Western News "Speech obscures Palestinian suffering"

Randa Farah, David Heap, Rebecca Coulter, Chet Creider, Sasha Torres, Wael Haddara, Paul Handford, Douglass St. Christian, Peter Chidiac, Marjorie Ratcliffe, Matthew Rowlinson, Sahza Hatibovic–Kofman, Roger Khayat, Abhijit Gopal, Tozun Bahcheli, Mireya Folch-Serra, Bernie Hammond, Lesley Short, Muhammad N. Saad and Mahmoud El-Sakka,

As academics, I trust you will accept the following critical letter in the constructive spirit of open, honest, intellectual debate and exchange of ideas that academia encourages and as I intend.

Since you signed the above article in your capacities as faculty members, it carries the prestige of the esteemed academic institution that you represent. It is therefore especially disappointing to find that, untypical of the academic standards of the University of Western Ontario, the article contains incorrect information presented as categorical facts.

For example, although a modest amount of investigation would have revealed that the Jewish National Fund (JNF) has never expelled anyone, you refer to "very strong evidence on the role of the JNF in the expulsion of Palestinians and the usurpation of their land"

The JNF was founded in 1901 to buy land in Palestine for Jewish settlement with funds largely collected from Jews around the world who contributed via the well-known "Blue Boxes'" in Jewish homes. It engages in reclamation and forestation in close cooperation with the Jewish Agency. Its legitimacy derives from the fact that the Agency was established in accordance with the 1922 League of Nations Mandate for Palestine that included the establishment and recognition of a "Jewish agency " comprised of representatives of world Jewry to assist in the " establishment of the Jewish National Home . . . in Palestine."

Your reference to the JNF, as an organization that allocates confiscated land to Jews only, is also incorrect. Although there never have been any restrictions on the purchase of private land in Israel, you are correct in that in the past, there was a restriction on the leasing of the small amount of JNF land bought by Jews for the use of Jews, a restriction that pales into insignificance by comparison with the expropriation of large amounts of land from aboriginal populations in Canada.

But, had you invested in just a little further research, you would have discovered that even this restriction has been removed. Among its activities, the JNF in cooperation with the Jewish Agency has been responsible for resettlement of new immigrants in accordance with the above Mandate decision of the League of Nations. And because this land was bought with funds collected for the specific purpose of resettling Jews, this land was in the past reserved for Jews.

However, in March 2000 the Israel High Court ruled 4-1 that even in allocation of JNF land, the state may not discriminate between Arabs and Jews. The one dissenting judge, Ya'acov Kedmi, stated that although the state has no right to discriminate against Arabs on state lands, the Jewish Agency, which was formed to promote Jewish settlement in Israel, does have the right to decide who can benefit from its resources.

Your strong criticism of President Paul Davenport for failing to refer to incidents alleged to have occurred in 1948 when he spoke of current achievements of the JNF, carries interesting implications. By the same token, a visitor to Canada would be obliged to qualify any praise of Canada with reference to the fact that in Canada "Indians today are the subject of legal discrimination; they have grievances because of past undertakings that have been broken or misunderstood; they do not have full control of their lands; and a higher proportion of Indians than other Canadians suffer poverty in all its debilitating forms". (See the White Paper, 1969, presented to the First Session of the 28th Parliament by Jean Chrétien, Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development)

Would you castigate me, if, in speaking about the incredible positive developments in Canada, I omit mentioning that even today, there are over one hundred reserves for Aboriginals in Alberta alone and that prevailing injustices provoked a day of action by Canada's aboriginal community last June? Would I be obliged to refer to a gravel quarry near Deseronto, on land never ceded by the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte, where trucks have carried an estimated 100,000 tons of newly crushed gravel out of the pit every year before agreement was reached to acquire the rights to do so. In a May 2007 article "More than A Mine, A Metaphor" in The Globe and Mail, Naomi Klein wrote "And as the time passes, the land disappears. Forests are clear-cut, mountains are carved up, suburbs creep outward. The only question is what form compensation for the theft will take".

It is difficult to understand what message you intend to convey by quoting carefully selected excerpts from the work of Yosef Nahmani as quoted by Benny Morris about alleged cruel acts by Israeli forces as if these occurred in a vacuum with deliberate planning and intent (if they indeed did occur as described).

The main indisputable facts are that in1947, the UN passed a partition resolution that the Jews accepted and the Arabs rejected. The moment the State of Israel was declared in May 1948, the Arab League declared "Holy War, with the publicly declared intention of driving the Jews into the sea. Arab League Secretary, Azzam Pasha declared "jihad". He said publicly "This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades". The Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin Al Husseini stated, "I declare a holy war, my Moslem brothers! Murder the Jews! Murder them all!"

Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Egypt and Iraq invaded the newborn state and Israel became involved in a war for survival.

The atrocities committed by Arabs are legion, but unlike the Israeli archives, the Arab archives have not been opened to researchers. More significantly, new historians like Benny Morris whom you quote, chose to ignore Arab atrocities as a matter of deliberate policy as recorded by Morris in "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited" in which he explains that in his research "What Jews did to Arabs, including massacres, played a role; What Arabs did to Jews was barely relevant" In other words, when Israelis responded to Arab attacks and atrocities, the Arab actions that triggered the Israeli responses, were ignored as irrelevant by Morris.

Very sadly, terrible thing happen in wars. When describing battles, I expect you will agree that it is misleading to list the actions and casualties of one side only.

I would very much appreciate your considered response, which I will study earnestly.

This open letter and any reply received from you will be distributed widely.

Sincerely,

Maurice Ostroff

Please enter your comments here. Thank you
Full name:
Email address:
Subject: