Countering Bias and Misinformation mainly about the Arab-Israel conflict

Memorandum number three to the Goldstone Mission

HOME
MISCELLANEOUS ARTICLES
INTERNATIONAL LAW
THE SAN REMO CONFEERENCE IN CONTEXT
THE GOLDSTONE MISSION TO GAZA 2009
THE OCCUPATION
GAZA and HAMAS
1948 ARAB-ISRAEL WAR
THE SIX-DAY WAR & RESOLUTION 242
BEHAVIOR OF ISRAELI SOLDIERS
DEIR YASSIN - startling evidence
1967 & ITS CONSEQUENCES
PALESTINIAN REFUGEES
WHAT SOME ARAB COMMENTATORS SAY
APARTHEID,ISRAEL & SOUTH AFRICA
LEBANON & HEZBOLLAH
HUMAN RIGHTS
ISLAMIC EXTREMISM
MEDIA DISTORTIONS
BOYCOTTS & DIVESTMENT
INCITEMENT
MEMORANDA TO UK PARLIAMENT
DOCUMENTS & ARTICLES
RECOMMENDED LINKS
THE ICJ & THE WALL
ACADEMIC FREEDOM
About Maurice Ostroff

 

re-enacmentoflynching.jpg

Click here for more about the Mission headed by Judge Richard Goldstone

 

Fom Maurice Ostroff   

To the UN Fact-finding mission into Israel's

Cast-lead operation in Gaza 

August 26, 2009

 

I feel compelled to write to you again, firstly because of the August 14 Hamas attack on the Ansar Allah group in a Gaza mosque, secondly because of a disturbing Palestinian TV show on June 19, glorifying the brutal lynching of two Israelis in October 2000 and thirdly because of Gilad Shalit’s continuing incarceration.

 

My main concern is that your Mission may arrive at its conclusions based only on the available evidence despite some evidence having been withheld by witnesses who have withdrawn due to fear of retribution.

 

Conclusions based on incomplete information have led in some cases to disastrous consequences. For example, one reads of tragic circumstances in which accused persons sentenced to prison on the basis of evidence available at the time of the trial, have been pardoned and released later, on production of evidence unavailable earlier. These unfortunate episodes are perhaps excusable where there were no indications of withheld evidence at the time sentence was passed. But your mission knows that some witnesses have withdrawn because of fears of retribution and the very reason for their withdrawal raises a red flag, indicating that their evidence could be critical. 

 

In these circumstances I believe that your fact-finding mission is obliged to exert every effort to obtain their evidence by all possible means including offering anonymity and protection.  By definition, fact-finding implies a pro-active search for all factual information including evidence that may not be readily accessible, so that the totality of the circumstances can be examined in context.

 

If the IDF’s actions are to be understood in context, the abundance of textual and visual evidence available on the Internet indicating how Hamas behavior left the IDF with no alternative but to react as it did, deserves in-depth investigation.  The video presentations I sent to you a while ago, contain some of this evidence. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx-CW3UKoIg&feature=related and
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLFAJK5LtwY

 

Nor can newspaper reports be ignored that confirm allegations of Hamas behavior that provoked the IDF responses that are being criticized.  In the Sydney Morning Herald of January 26, 2009, Muhammad Shriteh , an ambulance driver described how combatant Hamas operatives forced ambulance drivers to transport them. He said that he coordinated with the Israelis before picking up patients so they would not shoot at them and added that the more immediate threat was from Hamas, who would lure the ambulances into the heart of a battle to transport fighters to safety. He also said that Hamas operatives made several attempts to hijack the Al-Quds Hospital's fleet of ambulances. These tactics obviously made it impossible for the IDF to avoid civilian casualties. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/hamas-tried-to-hijack-ambulances-during-gaza-war/2009/01/25/1232818246374.html

 

Hamas and the other terrorist organizations often use ambulances for military purposes. For example, on May 24, 2004, Israel 's Channel 10 TV broadcast a videotape photographed by Reuters showing two UNRWA ambulances arriving at the site of an exchange of fire between the IDF and terrorist operatives, one clearly marked with a red cross and flying a UN flag. The ambulances evacuated two terrorist operatives wearing uniforms and an armed  wounded operative, also in uniform.

 

On January 22 the Italian daily Corriere della Sera carried the headline  “The boys of Hamas used us like targets.. Islamic militants prevented them from leaving the house and shot from inside the houses.”  A Gazan woman said that practically all of the tallest buildings in Gaza had been struck by Israeli bombs because they had rocket launchers on the roof or else were being used by Hamas as observation points. She also said that Hamas even set some rocket launchers close to the large UN depot that later went up in flames. In addition, according to the article, when the Gazans barricaded themselves inside their houses to keep Hamas operatives out, the operatives would use force to beat down the doors and windows.

 

The report also tells of Gazans speaking about rocket fire from the roofs of private houses and about Hamas operatives who sought shelter in a hospital.

 

The massacre in the mosque

The withdrawal of witnesses whose testimony would not please Hamas is readily understandable in view of the retribution inflicted by Hamas on all who disagree with them. The attack on the Salafi Jund Ansar Allah group in a mosque is one of many examples. It resulted in 22 people killed, (or massacred in the words of Mahmoud Abbas), including an 11-year-old child, and 125 badly wounded,

 

The cruel executions have continued unabated: from June 2007, when 25- year-old Mahmoud Abbas’ and others were ruthlessly bound and thrown to death from tall buildings; through September 2008 when Salafi-jihadis Army of Islam was destroyed and up to the latest attack on the Ansar Allah group.

 

Unfortunately the absence of testimony about weapons stored in mosques, hospitals and schools, the firing of rockets from schools and the blatant use of human shields, as well as the number of victims who were allegedly killed by Israelis -- but who in fact were felled by fellow Palestinians -- deprives you of essential information that would enable you to reach valid conclusions.

 

In seeking the truth, the unfortunate refusal of the Israel government to cooperate with your Mission should not deter you from studying documents available from an Israeli source. The Israel Foreign Ministry web site contains a comprehensive document “The Operation In Gaza: Factual And Legal Aspects” containing information essential to an understanding of the Cast Lead operation.  http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Hamas+war+against+Israel/Operation_Gaza_factual_and_legal_aspects_use_of_force_Hamas_breaches_law_of_armed_conflict_5_Aug_200.htm

The continuing dehumanization.

In view of Judge Goldstone’s statement during an Al Jazeera TV interview that dehumanization of the other is an essential component of every horrific group crime, whether in Rwanda or elsewhere, your attention is again drawn to the incitement that continues unabated in Gaza and the PA, contrary to Oslo agreements and the Road map.

 

 

For example, as recently as June 17, the official PA TV broadcast a performance featuring a Hamas teacher and Fatah students in which Fatah boasts of committing more terrorist acts against Israelis than Hamas. The capture of Gilad Shalit is praised and the October 2000 savage murder and mutilation of two Israeli reservists  is lauded as an example to be emulated. See http://vodpod.com/watch/1826092-abbass-fatah-brags-about-anti-israel-terror-defensemiddle-east-israel-news-israel-national-news

 

Your report will obviously be incomplete if it fails to deal in-depth with the role played by this continuing stoking of the fires of the conflict.  It can be confidently assumed that had there been no incitement, there would have been no Kassam rockets and consequently no need for the Israeli action in Gaza.

 

Gilad Shalit

Would it not have been a great achievement if your mission had been able to emulate former President Clinton’s rescue of the journalists from custody in North Korea by bringing Gilad Shalit back to his family?

 

Indeed, it is very disappointing that you missed the opportunity while meeting with his captors in Gaza, to at the least try to obtain some tangible evidence of Shalit’s condition. His incommunicado incarceration is a blatant, deliberately cruel crime against humanity that continues to cry out for the immediate attention of your mission, appointed as it was, by none other than the UN Human Rights Council.

 

By way of contrast, Palestinian prisoners in Israel enjoy visitation rights, including conjugal visits, access to telephones, newspapers, television and radio broadcasts, lawyers' visits and even academic studies at state expense.

 

The continued mental torture of Shalit’s family compounds the crime immeasurably. What greater torture can there be than tormenting parents with 24/7 anxiety for three years about whether their son is dead, and if alive in what condition?  To compound the heinous crime, Hamas recently organized a parade in which children in IDF uniform masqueraded as Gilad Shalit reading a letter in Hebrew, telling the jeering crowd, how he misses his parents.

 

No human being with a conscience can fail to protest this diabolical cruelty.

 

Conclusion

I hope you will find the above comments useful in your deliberations and I look forward to reading a balanced constructive report that will contribute towards a peaceful solution to the conflict in this region, leading to greater happiness for Israelis and Palestinians alike.

 

Sincerely

Maurice Ostroff

 

Please enter your comments here. Thank you
Full name:
Email address:
Subject: